2014-5. Readers’ Questions: Calibration
This month’s “LC Troubleshooting” looks at two reader-submitted questions regarding method calibration. LCGC 32(5) 328-333 (2014) John W. Dolan
Read More →This month’s “LC Troubleshooting” looks at two reader-submitted questions regarding method calibration. LCGC 32(5) 328-333 (2014) John W. Dolan
Read More →Two methods of calculating the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) disagree. Which, if either, is correct? LCGC 31(11) 926-931 (2013) John W. Dolan
Read More →When is curve weighting a good idea? LCGC 27(7) 534-540 (2009) John W. Dolan
Read More →The best results depend on the correct choice of calibration model. LCGC 27(6) 472-479 (2009) John W. Dolan Erratum: Table 1, in the third column, the next to last line should read 403913, not 36827, and the 36827 should shift down one row.
Read More →It’s all in the perspective LCGC 27(5) 392-400 (2009) John W. Dolan Erratum for LCGC 27(3), p 226, Figure 1. y-axis should be 0-1000, not 0-2000.
Read More →How are the signal-to-noise ratio and imprecision related? LCGC 27(4) 306-312 (2009) John W. Dolan Erratum: In Figure 1, the signal, S, should be measured from the middle of the noise band to the top of the peak, not from the top of the noise band.
Read More →Deciding on a zero intercept LCGC 27(3) 224-230 (2009) John W. Dolan Erratum: Figure 1 has the y-axis mislabeled. It should be 0-1000, not 0-2000. Also, attempts to replicate the results from Table 1 will be a problem because the values in Table 1 are rounded and more significant figures […]
Read More →